AI and the United Nations Security Council

The international community is standing at the precipice of a new era as generative and other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies reshape our world. This was the key message delivered during the recent United Nations Security Council meeting, marking the Security Council’s first formal discussion on the subject. As the debate unfolded, it became evident that the AI landscape presents a complex tapestry of both risks and rewards.


AI’s transformative potential

António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, opened the discussion by highlighting the transformative potential of AI. He noted that AI has been likened to the printing press, revolutionising how we access information and interact with technology. In a staggering comparison, he pointed out that ChatGPT, an AI model, reached 100 million users in just two months, showcasing the rapid adoption of AI technologies in our society.


The challenge of disinformation

However, Mr. Guterres did not shy away from addressing the darker side of AI. He cautioned that AI has the capacity to amplify bias, reinforce discrimination, and enable authoritarian surveillance. The potential for disinformation and hate speech to thrive in an AI-driven world is a significant concern. As AI models become more sophisticated, the ability to generate convincing fake content has escalated, posing a severe threat to truth and trust.


AI as a national security and cyber threat

Jack Clark, Co-founder of Anthropic, echoed these concerns. He emphasised that while AI can bring immense benefits, it can also be misused, leading to threats to global security, peace, and stability.

AI’s unpredictable nature means it can be used for nefarious purposes, such as constructing biological weapons or engaging in malicious cyber operations.


The importance of responsible AI governance

One of the key takeaways from the discussion was the importance of responsible governance of AI. The idea of leaving AI development solely to private-sector actors was challenged by Mr. Clark. He argued that governments must play a crucial role in keeping companies accountable. Developing robust evaluation systems to assess the safety, reliability, and ethical implications of AI technologies is paramount.


A unique perspective

Yi Zeng of the Institute of Automation at the Chinese Academy of Sciences added a unique perspective by emphasising the limitations of current AI technologies. He stressed that these AI systems lack true understanding and cannot be trusted as responsible decision-makers. Additionally, the risk of human extinction from AI’s utilisation of human weaknesses must be considered, raising existential concerns.


The imperative to retain human decision-making in AI systems

In the ensuing debate among Security Council members, it was evident that AI’s potential to intensify conflict through the spread of misinformation and the use of autonomous weapons systems was a significant concern. The imperative to retain human decision-making in these systems was underscored repeatedly.


Calls for ethical AI governance

Several delegates also stressed the urgent need for an ethical and responsible framework for international AI governance. Omran Sharaf of the United Arab Emirates highlighted the brief window of opportunity to unite and establish rules for AI technology. Ghana’s representative echoed this sentiment, emphasising the importance of constraining national ambitions and developing frameworks for peaceful AI applications.

China’s representative emphasised that whether AI is used for good or evil depends on how it is harnessed and regulated. He advocated for putting ethics first and ensuring that technology benefits humanity while addressing safety, risk-awareness, fairness, and inclusivity.


The militarisation of AI

AI has been integrated into autonomous weapons systems. The speaker for Ecuador rejected the militarisation of AI and reiterated the risk posed by lethal autonomous weapons.

James Cleverly, Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Affairs of the United Kingdom, acknowledged the moral questions surrounding AI’s accountability for lethal decisions on the battlefield and called for global governance of transformative technologies.


Global cooperation to mitigate AI risks

The consensus among Security Council members was clear: the international community must work together urgently to navigate the intricate landscape of AI. While it offers incredible potential for progress and innovation, the risks associated with its misuse and unregulated development are equally significant. Establishing a robust framework for ethical AI governance is paramount to ensure that this powerful tool serves humanity’s best interests rather than becoming a source of division and conflict.

Nyman Gibson Miralis provides expert advice and representation in cases involving alleged cybercrimes and threats to international security.

Contact us if you require assistance.